I just try contacting Rim it goes to their auto reply and then drops the
call. This is a dark day for all blackberry users I can't believe they
don't have redundecy or contingency planning in place. 

Dr


Dennis Rogov
Senior Network Analyst 
THE Peer GROUP an informed medical communications company 

379 thornall street, 12th floor  | edison, nj 08837 usa

Direct: 732-205-8376 | fax: 732.321.0636 |Cell:732.861.2277

[EMAIL PROTECTED]                   www.peergroupinc.com
[This e-mail and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or
lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient of
this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this email in error please immediately notify
me at (732) 205-8376 and permanently delete the original copy and any
copy of any e-mail, and any printout thereof. ]

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 6:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003

An average disk queue length of 10 is abysmal.

Running a defrag will not help and may very well hurt.

How large are your stores? What is the hardware of the disks? How often
is online maintenance completing?

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Milosavljevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 5:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sluggish Performance Exchange 2003

Performance on our Exchange 2003 box has deteriorated and users are
complaining of poor response in opening emails. The box is an IBM 2.4
Ghz, 4gig ram supporting 500 users. The software is windows 2003
enterprise. Running performance monitor gave disk queue length of around
10 on the stores volume - sometimes more. Running disk defrag utility on
stores volume gave volume fragmentation as 49% and file fragmentation as
98%. My question is - can you use windows defrag utility to clean this
up or is there a better third party utility to do the job or am I
looking in the wrong area for the poor performance?
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to