I believe that the totals in ESM include the DIR, while the Outlook totals do not...however I could be wrong.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Davies,Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes we do. > > > > *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* 03 June 2008 15:53 > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Exchange Mailbox sizes > > > > Do you use deleted item retention? > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Davies,Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi Gents, Ladies and Andy Shook, > > > > We have a problem where either Exchange 2003 or Outlook is reporting > mailbox sizes incorrectly.ESM is reporting the size in some cases 400MB more > than outlook reports the mailbox size. > > > > It doesn't matter if it is outlook 2003 or outlook 2007, we are running > exchange 2003 SP2 and up to date with all the various hotfixes. > > > > Has anyone seen this before ? or know what to look for, or should I call > Microsoft ? > > > > Cheers > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > > This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be > privileged. > It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only. If you are not the > addressee, > you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is > strictly > prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase > all > copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
