OK, here's my latest thought. I just can't stand the idea of six servers for 500 users. Seems a bit too many.
Setup a failover cluster with Exchange 2007 running in a hyper-v VM. This way all of the roles can run on a single (heck even multiple) VM and failover as needed. Thoughts? things I should be worried about? You know, besides Hyper-v not even being released yet :) Jason Tierney, MCITP Vice President, Consulting Services Corporate Network Services "Count on Us" direct: 240-425-4441 -----Original Message----- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:41 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Cluster And the best come with hot-swap RAM and hot-swap processors. Datacenter server speaks both. I think Enterprise only speaks hot-swap RAM. Standard speaks neither. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com -----Original Message----- From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 9:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Cluster > -----Original Message----- > From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Cluster > > Until servers come with redundant motherboards, CPU and Memory a server > can have raid234 and 5 power supplies and could still fail if a memory > stick gets flaky. Most high quality servers come with the option of redundant RAM. Webster ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
