Thanks Carl

 

There will be an ISA server between our new exchange server and the
internet, if we go along that route.

 

Just as there is now between the old one and the internet.

 

At the moment there are no plans to have support in the US cover our
time zone.

 

Regards

 

Kevan

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 20 August 2008 18:15
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RPC over HTTPS question

 

Has anyone asked Michigan whether they can cover you for support at your
normal working hours?   Can't hurt to ask.

 

The answer to your question is "yes" but best practice dictates that a
FE server, an ISA server, and usually both, be in between the unwashed
Internet and your Exchange server.   This is particularly important now
that you're part of a larger worldwide org and a problem with your
security can spread far and wide.

 

If no one in Michigan is concerned about you doing this, then you can
just do it.   But those people in Michigan need to be asked.

 

Carl

 

From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 12:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RPC over HTTPS question

 

The management at my company is asking.

 

I am quiet happy to use the front end server of the new company which I
now have working for my test users.

 

I think they want to still feel that we can operate without needing to
rely on the US.

 

It's the, what if we come in one morning and the Front end server is not
working for some reason.  How are our remote users going to get email
until someone in Michigan gets in to fix the problem scenario.

 

If our users could connect directly to our exchange server we could
probably resolve any Exchange connection issues ourselves.

 

Another front end server in the UK might be the best answer but the last
time I raised that issue they did not want to buy another exchange
license.

 

Regards.

 

Kevan 

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 20 August 2008 17:06
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: RPC over HTTPS question

 

Who is doing the asking?  What is the goal?  What is broken that needs
fixing?

 

Since a FE server already exists for the organization, I'd say "give it
a try".   You probably won't know the difference.

 

Carl

 

 

From: Kevan Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 11:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RPC over HTTPS question

 

We have been using RPC over HTTPS for a number of years and everyone is
very happy with it.

 

We are using Exchange Server 2003 sp2.

 

We only have a single Exchange 2003 server. No front end.

 

The company have recently been bought by a much larger organization in
the US that have a Front End Exchange 2003 server for OWA and RCP access
and 4 backend Exchange 2003 servers.

 

All our user accounts are being migrated to the new companies domain and
a new exchange server has been setup in the UK for our users.

 

I am being asked if it is possible to set up our exchange server so that
our users can access it directly for OWA and RCP access just as they
have been done in the past to save them having to access their email via
the Front End server in the US.

 

We have our own internet connection and regular email is going to flow
in and out of our exchange server directly and not via the gateway in
the US.

 

Regards.

 

Kevan Dickinson

Network Manager

NSF-CMI

23 Lodge Road

Hanborough Business Park, Long Hanborough,

Oxford, OX29 8SJ, UK

 

T:+44 01993 885661

E:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

W:www.nsf-cmi.com

 

 

 

************************************************************************
********

    ***Disclaimer***

The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, NSF-CMi Ltd and
its subsidiaries are unable to guarantee the security of Email content
outside of our own computer systems.

This footnote also confirms that this Email message has been checked by
MailMarshal for the presence of computer viruses. Whilst we run
anti-virus software, you are solely responsible for ensuring that any
Email or attachment you receive is virus free. We disclaim any liability
for any damage you suffer as a consequence of receiving any virus.

NSF-CMi Ltd
Registered in England No: 1899857
Registered Office 4th Floor, 35 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6BW

************************************************************************
**********

 

 

 

 

************************************************************************
********

    ***Disclaimer***

The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, NSF-CMi Ltd and
its subsidiaries are unable to guarantee the security of Email content
outside of our own computer systems.

This footnote also confirms that this Email message has been checked by
MailMarshal for the presence of computer viruses. Whilst we run
anti-virus software, you are solely responsible for ensuring that any
Email or attachment you receive is virus free. We disclaim any liability
for any damage you suffer as a consequence of receiving any virus.

NSF-CMi Ltd
Registered in England No: 1899857
Registered Office 4th Floor, 35 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6BW

************************************************************************
**********

 

 

 

 


********************************************************************************

                          ***Disclaimer***

The contents of this Email may be privileged and are confidential. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action 
taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be 
unlawful.

Should you wish to use Email as a mode of communication, NSF-CMi Ltd and its 
subsidiaries are unable to guarantee the security of Email content outside of 
our own computer systems.

This footnote also confirms that this Email message has been checked by 
MailMarshal for the presence of computer viruses. Whilst we run anti-virus 
software, you are solely responsible for ensuring that any Email or attachment 
you receive is virus free. We disclaim any liability for any damage you suffer 
as a consequence of receiving any virus.

NSF-CMi Ltd
Registered in England No: 1899857
Registered Office 4th Floor, 35 New Bridge Street, London, EC4V 6BW

**********************************************************************************

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to