One of my Ninja crazy smart Engineers discovered a bug in the Roll up 7 already.. We are filing a bug with MS as we speak, I wonder if we can get a RU7.1 out of it = ]
When you send mail from a user that is hidden from the GAL after RU7 is installed the reply to address is the legacy exchange DN for that user. When sending from a user that is not hidden everything works fine. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS My life http://www.hedonists.ca<http://www.hedonists.ca/> From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:31 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Update RU3 being offered after RU6 installed That is weird. What happens when you try to check for updates directly from the Ex Server itself? That would tell if it's WSUS or something else. Also, RU7 was released yesterday. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/960384 - John Barsodi From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Update RU3 being offered after RU6 installed Hi all I think this is to do with WSUS, but I'm not entirely sure. I've installed a dev CAS server into the organization and got it fully patched (Windows Server 2008 and Exchange Server 2007 SP1 RU6). However, Windows Update - WSUS - is telling me that RU3 should also be applied. Has anyone seen this behaviour before? Another server I've installed recently (mailbox role) was patched straight to SP1 RU6 and isn't offering to install RU3. The only difference between the servers is that one (the CAS) is a VM running on ESX, the mailbox server is physical. Richard ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
