Thanks for the reply Michael. The reason we are using the Exchange resource model is because our parent company does not want to consolidate forests at this particular time. They only want to consolidate e-mail servers and services.
-----Original Message----- From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 1:28 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 or Exchange 2010 Well, first, I'm not sure I'd do it that way, but I don't know your environment. GAL synchronization tools are more mature for Exchange 2007, and I expect them to be that way probably throughout most of CY 2010. That is what I would probably regard as a blocking factor for Exchange 2010... Regards, Michael B. Smith Exchange MVP & Owner: The Essential Exchange http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael From: Chris Pohlschneider [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 1:19 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2007 or Exchange 2010 Hello All: We are going to be immersed in a company wide e-mail project this year that will involve multiple forests. Our plan is to create an Exchange Resource Forest and establish trusts between all of the forests that we are going to be hosting e-mail for. More than likely, we will be starting the install of Exchange in the second business quarter of this year. I would like to get an opinion from the list of whether Exchange 2007 would be the best option since it has been out for a while or go with Exchange 2010. Chris Pohlschneider Holloway Sportswear Network Administrator [email protected] 937-494-2559
