We bought 11. Out of the original people that wanted them, only 1 still uses 
it.  The remaining 10 are still being shuffled around from person to person who 
thinks that it's neat when they first get it but then discover it doesn't do 
everything they want it to without buying "this app" or "that app", or they 
just don't like it.  They usually end up going back to the Blackberry.

-Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:06 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: iPhone and Exch 2007?

Let me follow-up with this - is anyone here using iPhone in their Exchange 
environment?

David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER 
NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION
(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764



-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: iPhone and Exch 2007?

This is cool, but I thought Sybase was a database vendor.

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 17:01, Barsodi.John <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes.
>
>
>
> Native encryption on the 3GS in a joke and can be easily bypassed.
>
>
>
> Our Security team did a complete risk assessment on it.  We also didn’t like
> relying on whatever subset of features of the EAS protocol the vendor
> decides to implement.
>
>
>
> So we have GOOD Messaging and Sybase in for a bake off to be our non-BB
> device management and connectivity point.  With the sandbox approach that
> both vendors have taken we don’t care if the device is corporate or
> personally owned.  The data lives in its owned encrypted sandbox.  So you
> kill pill/erase and disable/nuke only the corporate data and not the entire
> device.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> JB
>
>
>
> From: David Lum [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:30 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: iPhone and Exch 2007?
>
>
>
> Sorry if this has been covered already, but are there security concerns with
> an iPhone in a corpoerate Exchange environment?
>
>
>
> Dave



Reply via email to