An Exchange server is NOT a file server. And note, I said "useless cr*p". It's the same routine. I get calls from users complaining that the mailbox is full. I remind them that the way to check their mailbox is documented on the intranet, but we still go over it. We sort by age, we sort by size. Lo and behold, there is "useless cr*p" they can delete. The bigger the mailbox, the more useless cr*p we find, and the less likely the user is to sift through all that mail. "I don't have time to go through all that email". At what point did the email reach a level that the user COULDN'T MANAGE IT?
It's the same with file storage, and the reason companies have document management systems. You can't save every piece of data. This mentality reminds me of when they go into the homes of some people and find stacks and stacks of newspapers in every room from floor to ceiling. From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper So wait, now employees can't file paper or emails? So where does this important company correspondence go? In the trash? Try to tell the auditors and the legal dept. that. Save EVERYTHING. </Devil's Advocate Off> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 10:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper <rant on> Dear employees, Is your file cabinet full? Can't stuff another piece of paper in it? Don't worry, we just bought you a bigger file cabinet so you don't have to clean out the useless cr*p in your old one, compliments of Microsoft. Next we have to figure out how to finance the backup solution to cover this bloated whale that has washed up on shore. </rant off> From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper We've previously debated large mailboxes on this list, with some of us arguing that users ought to be able to use e-mail as a file transfer/storage mechanism even if that's not what e-mail wasn't originally designed for, while others argued that e-mail is much less efficient than other means of doing this. Actually, those two arguments aren't mutually exclusive. Anyhow, Microsoft seems to recognize that there's just no stopping people from using e-mail this way, and they designed Exchange 2010 with that in mind. Below is a link to their Exchange 2010 Large Mailbox Vision Whitepaper: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID= e3303d34-af6c-4108-861b-dc05f9cf3e76&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=fe ed&utm_campaign=Feed:+MicrosoftDownloadCenter+(Microsoft+Download+Center ) They write: "Giving your users the ability to store more e-mail has many advantages. Large mailboxes keep e-mail on the Exchange Server instead of allowing it to be scattered in Outlook Data Files (.PST files). That helps reduce the risk of data loss, improve regulatory compliance, and increase productivity among both workers and IT staff. The main barrier to implementing large mailboxes is the perceived cost and complexity of storing large amounts of e-mail data. Microsoft(r) Exchange Server 2010 is specifically designed to overcome these barriers. This paper discusses how Exchange 2010 enables you to give users large mailboxes without breaking your budget." John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District www.taylor.k12.fl.us NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure.
