I guess too much Pac Man for me today! LOL -----Original Message----- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Is the Office assistant, disable by default because of security risk (in exchange)?
It was ambiguous, yes... On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:59, David Mazzaccaro <[email protected]> wrote: > You are thinking about the Out Of Office Assistant. > I believe the OP is talking about the Office Assistant (Like that > annoying paperclip... Clippy) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 1:49 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Is the Office assistant, disable by default because of > security risk (in exchange)? > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 09:57, justino garcia > <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> >> Is the out office assistant, disable by default because of security >> risk (in exchange 2k3 + owa)? > > Don't know that, but IMHO it's a good thing regardless, for two > reasons, which are related to each other: > > 1) When I send an email to someone, I don't need to know that they're > out of the office, I need a response from a person, so it's really > annoying to get a notification that I'm being ignored for however long > that the person decides to be unresponsive. > > 2) If I'm sending an email to someone for business purposes, it's > annoying to receive an OoO message (see the point above) and poor > customer service - the email account should be covered by a delegate, > and if a timely response is required, the delegate should make one. > > Kurt > > > . > > > .
