I would agree with this, SAN/UC certs are more flexible when it comes to multiple domains. Additionally it is a must if you use the UM role with SIP/TLS and want to use a single SAN cert for both Exchange and Lync.
However for customers who already have a wildcard cert, and it will do everything they need, I would go with that. Steve Sent from my iPhone On 8 Feb 2012, at 06:11, "Richard Stovall" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I'm certainly no expert on this, but the simple answer, to me, depends on whether you will have any clients that will be accessing your Exchange server (I'm presuming a single server) using more than one domain name. If so, SAN cert. If not, wildcard _may_ do it. If your internal AD domain is different from your public domain(s), then you need a SAN cert. If not, consider a wildcard cert, but only under certain circumstances. It seems that, in most cases, the greater flexibility of a SAN cert far exceeds the incremental increase in cost over a single domain wildcard cert. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jimmy Tran <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi All, What type of cert do you use? I’m working on my deployment and ran into the question, which cert to use and why? SAN or Wildcard? Thanks, Jimmy --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to [email protected] with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
