On Saturday 23 May 2009 09:36:48 am Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2009 09:25:42 -0500 > > "Sterling X. Winter" <[email protected]> wrote: > > because it also reinstalls unaffected packages > > Clearly that is a good thing.
Well it certainly doesn't hurt to reinstall every package. When I say "affected" I'm also including packages which appear anywhere in ::installed metadata, so the script should be equally as effective with respect to the ranged dep changes, plus the aforementioned advantages it offers over `paludis -i everything`. > > because unhandled exceptions make Paludis barf without allowing the > > operation to resume where it left off. > > Mmm. That should never happen. What's giving unhandled exceptions? It happens when Paludis removes old Python packages that hadn't been migrated to EXHERES_PHASE. tanderson mentioned in #exherbo yesterday that he was also encountering unhandled exceptions preventing him from resuming (not sure if his were Python-related). _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
