Bryan Østergaard wrote:
Personally I'd hate assigned-to.This is completely unrelated to masks
as such but I want to avoid any kind of ownership when possible.
Ownership pretty much screams "that guy is responsible so I shouldn't
/ don't have to fix it" and I'd much rather just see everything as one
big pool of things to do with anybody being able to fix anything
(doesn't matter if it's an official Exherbo dev or somebody we've
never heard of before really).
Hm, maybe I have been misunderstood here.
I didn't see the assigned-to in a way that when somebody masks a package
(maybe for security issues) he sets someone else to be responsible for it.
I rather meant it as a statement that when someone tries to solve the
issue, sets that as a note, so people know who they should contact in
case they have to add something.
For unwritten, we do that by modifying the comments.
Obviously, that could be another way, maybe a better way, I'm not sure
about it.
Anyway, I didn't mean the assign-to to be something that introduces some
kind of »mask-wrangling«.
_______________________________________________
Exherbo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
