On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:13:19 +0100 "Wulf C. Krueger" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14.01.2012 00:30, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote: > > I suggest removing busybox from the system set (and make the few > > packages that need it, if any, depend on it directly). > > Ok, two in favour of this change, two against it (out of lazyness). > > Who's going to be the tie-breaker? :-)
I suggest you leave it until someone's tried implementing a 'stages' set. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
