-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13.09.2012 02:52, Arne Janbu wrote: > Given that packages like wayland are emerging and we now have it > in ::desktop, we need some discussion about repository naming. We > had a discussion in #exherbo about the right place for wayland and > found out, it wouldn't fit in ::x11 because it has nothing todo > with x11 itself. Mesa also is in ::x11, which doesn't make sense > anymore.
Actually, the repository name isn't really that important. If people search, they're using cave search and will easily find Wayland (and whatever else). Not that they need to because Paludis will tell them if and which repository is needed that they might not have. > My proposal for this: ::x11 is only for x11 itself and it's > pakages ::desktop needs to be thought about <name here> would fit > for packages like wayland, mesa, glu, etc. Bollocks. > I know that this change will affect a lot of packages and needs > some work, but if we want to have a consistent naming schema, we > should have to do this renaming and moving. That's why I ask about > it here and I'd like to see your proposals. First, get rid of categories and then we can talk about repository names. :-) - -- Best regards, Wulf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBTTkgACgkQnuVXRcSi+5p4SwCgjXRAe0K5pSTvbIEvavW/iiDf eiEAoNb7jInFWhLxIgdo95bwnCpso7lC =Zzkx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
