On 7 February 2013 11:34, Quentin Glidic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 09:21, Nakamura wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Quentin Glidic <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Is there any reason to keep profile.env around then? (Same question for > >> profile.csh.) > > > > Is chroot using pam? > > If not, we need profile.env for chrooted environment (such as system > > installation or development). > > Good catch, but nothing problematic here as chroot does not change the > environment at all. > Also, in our current stages, /root/.bashrc is empty, no references to > profile.env either. > > -- > > Quentin “Sardem FF7” Glidic > > _______________________________________________ > Exherbo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev > The documentation tells to source /etc/profile, which pulls in profile.env Maybe we could just keep the two of them around ?
_______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
