I prefer to see Exherbo as a distributive which gives a good environment for developer and allows much more customization than most user will want. Having some people using IPv4 configuration for some libs/programs usually allows to reveal issues related with such variant in upstream (ex. net-misc/mtr). I'd prefer to to drop options in upstream first and only then in associated package.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Bryan Østergaard < [email protected]> wrote: > Killing options is (almost) always a good idea. I'm all for it :) > > /Bryan > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Wulf C. Krueger <[email protected]> > wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello! > > > > It's the time of year again during which we traditionally discuss the > > removal of the "ipv6" option. (I've checked my IRC logs since 2008 and > > we always discussed this during autumn for some reason! :-) ) > > > > Recently, we got a patch > > (https://galileo.mailstation.de/gerrit/#/c/298/) to disable the ipv6 > > option for NSPR. > > > > I'm *not* in favour of that specific patch because it would mean we > > would basically arbitrarily remove the ipv6 option from random > > packages, not knowing what might break. Instead, I'd like us to just > > drop the ipv6 option *completely*. > > > > Personally, I've been running every single machine for the last 5 > > years or so with IPv6 enabled globally - nothing ever broke. And that > > was independent of the actual existence of IPv6 connectivity (which I > > didn't always have). > > > > As for the argument that things might break if someone doesn't compile > > IPv6 support into his kernel - things are likely to break if you don't > > compile-in support for your CPU either. Just don't do that then. > > > > We should, of course, add some instructions about that to our > > documentation but that's something I'll gladly do. > > > > Comments? > > > > (Please speak up, too, if you're in favour of my proposal; I'm looking > > at you, Heiko and Saleem! ;-) ) > > > > - -- > > Best regards, Wulf > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > > > iEYEARECAAYFAlKomLwACgkQnuVXRcSi+5rKVgCgtjpDa9nD6mywBiUYw0lRJjrz > > Hh8AoN9yXTSeKHERGt74OBcGKcHqgDaQ > > =wxDt > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Exherbo-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Exherbo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev >
_______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
