-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 01/02/2016 01:43 AM, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > So you've taken three patches from LKML which > > - will be two years old soon, > - haven't even been commented upon, > - haven't been accepted upstream, > - don't seem to be important even to their author because he didn't > pursue their inclusion. > > This is the wrong way. Please get those patches included *upstream*, > contact their author, do whatever is necessary but please do NOT patch > parts of the kernel itself for compatibility with musl. > > I don't really mind your patches to other packages (and I appreciate > what you're doing in general) but please leave the kernel as upstream > intends it to be. I agree with Wulf, I expect my linux-sources to be pure as virgin snow. I would recommend making a guide to keep track of these things for the user trying to use musl. You're likely to have other bookkeeping notes to be aware of so they'll need to read that anyway. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWiBODAAoJEIuY+TvpgPmHeW8QALFr21opJ1VnAK01VRyGQRGw uVqjXIV0G1oJwNKaFUO+jjbM3e0ko0aGWmEWEj+dSS24nwVb1sZDtO1rgJ++PL4N aNSyasZ1uy39lKXFJ6W/iP0wZkRftLl5JHKU1vnx4Jds0kH4yHKfvVEn1RVN0vGe IVgBQ4RuerTupnQdQCsjZbXMxLAbqvQpsBifKi76qKoGDjI7+qGMhl5YdbtUy6fk nQFTSdjB7YK4gyzOQ52xATdvwsY2eoVKfynxwr6nNqY8ymJ0q4ZRmUgyq+QT2YTc u2QRpMQuEHe6cTBXE4ERkia9cgoCR0aabKn/2gVA+MiI1j4KXJMTb/IGQPY87hb6 dAOga0v9kuGsKEp94ik+nMK9RsydIePNDWjj+jIjzQID6aDxiiUQ6xq3NFnm1uJl r9aceCUK2WxCDt9J2jcUAW0uOC7ILu4ZasIQT/7y4MMYNc3EwcXnVATSa2j1bT2C AW7kCSo88eLgB0beIgHM5O5GmPTOUQUIyxEnPQrg5B0/f02wjZGSUQY8L6DUpDRw Yw3RcmIjjmGVEISe4ENdzHTSg5pZzNeUOxegqkDjLUf9qElh0M3Wbd6utet4EJrN OdHB+i5/CeUrC0Fa3z3y7k0H53Dv//1FoHl61/CiW1W07TNWOO7psWBqvYjUl048 aqaqX69+JAR5yycIRfk5 =lrGl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Exherbo-dev mailing list Exherbo-dev@lists.exherbo.org http://lists.exherbo.org/mailman/listinfo/exherbo-dev
