On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Marc Sherman wrote: > By the way, just to this to the current threads on exim-users, "no_more" > doesn't appear in either index.
That's because no_anything is the same as anything=false and the index entry is for anything. Perhaps I should add this index entry: no_<anything> see <anything> Hmm. I wonder if it's possible to do that in DocBook? Maybe not. The current docs have a dozen or so "see xxx" index entries, and none of these are present in the new world. I will put this on the list of infelicities to investigate. Also, it would be nice in the HTML index to be able to hyperlink to the various letters, I feel. I don't want to put in duplicate no_ index entries for every boolean option, but perhaps no_more is so common that it ought to be there. > I've really only got one showstopper to point out -- in the spec.html, the > section headings link back to the TOC, but in filter.html, they don't. Can > that be fixed? I find those back links very useful. I wrote a script to put them in for the spec (see HowItsDone.txt), and didn't bother for the filter. I guess I could write another script... -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
