On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:52 +0200, V. T. Mueller wrote:
> Nevertheless, having pcre omitted from the exim distribution would
> result in:
>
> - adding (not always a first) external prerequisite to exim
> - change the way BSD packages have to be built
> - would not help regarding the numerous other software that uses
> pcre (see Nigel's post)
My own feeling is that I would like to have the mechanism to select at
build time the use of an internally packaged PCRE or a system PCRE.
That gives a migration path for OSes to move to having PCRE as a system
library and reducing the n copies they have across the system to just
one.
This does tend to also require that PCRE have a stable API and ideally a
way of reporting back its version number so that information can be seen
when debugging exim problems. I confess I'm currently too lazy/busy/etc
to have looked up whether these requirements/assumptions are true.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
