Philip Hazel wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Daniel Tiefnig wrote: > > The thing is, the test script wants to run as "you" most of the time, > so it can call Exim "as an ordinary user".
Ah, that sounds reasonable of course. >> | $ ls -l /home/tiefnig/exim/exim-testsuite-0.00/eximdir/ >> | total 0 > > It's empty because the script has removed the "dangerous" patched > version of Exim as it finishes. Gee! > The problem is the same as one you had earlier; the fact that your > home directory isn't accessible. But I changed permissions on /home/tiefnig/ to 0755 before this run... Ah, this was a leftover from my first run, "eximdir" was still owned by "tiefnig.Debian-exim"... Now Basic/0005 succeeds, as do Tests 0006 to 0014. For Basic/0015 and 0016 (local part pre- and suffix) to succeed, I had to add gecos information to my account, and enable the substitution on line 250 of runtest again. Test 0017 and 0018 (ETRN) say things like: | Line 24 of "test-stderr-munged" does not match line 24 of | "stderr/0017". | ---------- | >>> name=the.local.host.name address=127.0.0.1 | ---------- | >>> name=localhost address=127.0.0.1 0019 and 0031 are okay, and on my setup runtest has finished with "basic" tests then. lg, daniel -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
