Regardless of queue runner start intervals, the system is self-synchronizing.
(1) receiving machine recovers from outage (2) a queue runner on a sending machine successfully delivers a message, then based on the hints db starts pumping messages down the connection (3) at various intervals other queue runners on the sending machines do the same, increasing the receiver's load by stages (4) when the load is too high, the receiver starts deferring *all* senders at the *same* time (5) thus they put the same retry time in their databases Tony. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
