> I fully understand that, and I see *your* need for the facility and I'm > prepared to put it in. Just not as the default.
The default would make the world a better place if Exim suddenly took over. Aren't you surprised how widespread it already is? :-) > > Are you willing to bet that somebody would still like to get the old > > behaviour back? > > I am not a betting person, but I would not be surprised if there wasn't > somebody who wanted predictability. In fact, *I* do, for testing. :-) >From host.c, random_number(): if (running_in_test_harness) random_seed = 42; Sounds very predictable for testing to me. If anything, I would introduce a new option that contains the old behaviour for those few who urgently want it, and only do so when somebody speaks up. Michael -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
