On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Michael Haardt wrote: > I am currently checking if the Sieve implementation conforms to > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-03.txt > > and found the following: > > Implementations SHOULD NOT respond to any message that contains a > "List-Id" [RFC2919], "List-Help", "List-Subscribe", "List- > Unsubscribe", "List-Post", "List-Owner" or "List-Archive" [RFC2369] > header field. > > Exim checks for existance of "List-*" headers, so it actually does more. > Why?
I cannot remember, but probably because "it seemed like a good idea at the time". > In case there are more List headers than those above, it would make sense > to add them to the above list or even suggest to use "List-*" instead. > In case there are no more, I would prefer if Exim used exactly that list I imagine that I imagined that people would keep inventing new List- header lines, and it seemed sensible to react to any of them. The feature was added at 4.42 but the ChangLog doesn't give any background. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
