On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:20:33PM +0200, David Saez Padros wrote: > > if the sender get the 551 code (some MTA's just hide the real 5xx code) > and if the sender understands english and if the sender is able to > recognize the bounce error in the middle of the bounce message, most > users will just discard the bounce and the recipient will never get that > mail.
The assumption that all your senders can figure out what a 551 bounce message means is not something everyone can do, yes. But as said before I don't pretend that this feature is useful to everyone. > > That said, I have interest in implementing the sender part for Exim. > > this would be really interesting for some situations, specially if it can > be sure (or the behaviour could be customized) that the remote client > understands (and redirects) the 551 code I mean the sender part (the one that should understand the 551 code). > >> and what about using RFC 1035 experimental 'MR' (Mail Rename) 'MB' > >> (Mailbox) and 'MG' (Mail Group) DNS records ? > > > > That seems to serve a different purpose (affecting mail sent by some > > senders, > > rather than mail sent by any of them). > > it affects mail sent by any sender that is able to process that records Then it's not any sender :) -- Robert Millan -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
