On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 04:34:31PM +0100, Philip Hazel wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Robert Millan wrote: > > > Just gave it a quick look before. I'm not sure about 5xx, but do 421 and > > 221 > > really correspond to defer and accept, respectively? > > Exim gives 451 if there's a defer for RCPT, but it uses 421 in messages > such as "421 Too many concurrent SMTP connections". That particular one > isn't accessible via an ACL, but one might plausibly expect somebody to > want to use 421 in an acl_smtp_connect ACL, I think. The x2x codes are > concerned with the connection rather than with a message, but so are > ACLs at times...
Ah, ok. > Should have this done this week, possibly even tomorrow if it goes > well. Then it will be in the snapshot and you can test it. Nice, thanks! -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
