On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 03:35:46PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > - We're a forwarder, smtp'ing to the next hop after we parsed ~/.forward. > > - We're a sender, smtp'ing to the next hop after we got a 551. > > > > Can we handle #2 the same way #1 is? > > No, because #1 is a routing operation which happens entirely before the > transport phase.
Can we get back to the router from the transport by issuing sendmail(1) as if we were a MUA? -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
