On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: > > I think in the case of exim -v -bv test-bv last one should be like this: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exim -v -bv test-bv > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed to verify: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Unknown user > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > router = localuser_maildir, transport = ld_maildir > > test-bv _did_ verify successfully in this case, since there was at least > one valid recipient. this is quite important to report correctly, since > it mimics the truth value of "verify = recipient" in an ACL.
I can argue against that because "verify = recipient" in an ACL is equivalent to "exim -bv" NOT "exim -v -bv". When only -bv is used, it *does* succeed. However, I agree that in the example above, it should show the actual unknown user and the detail of the redirection. -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
