On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:18, Philip Hazel wrote: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > > Yes... Marc admitted that he could have kept a closer eye on this. > > Anyway, as the Debian maintainer of SA-Exim, I hereby ask you to bump up > > the minor version (I can do it myself too). > > Go ahead and do it yourself quickly, then it will be in 4.64. Remember > to update Changelog.
Done. > > Isn't it time to accept the patch into mainstream Exim? Without making it > > the default, of course. And without removing the long comment from > > local_scan.c about how to write a local_scan() function. > > I don't think anyone has actually asked for that before, or sent me the > patch, but I may be mis-remembering. It's been in the wishlist for quite some time. Doesn't that imply that a request for it to be included some time has been made? The patch itself is at http://marc.merlins.org/linux/exim/files/sa-exim-current/localscan_dlopen_exim_4.20_or_better.patch and the patch used by Debian is identical except that it doesn't add -ldl to LFLAGS. -- Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgpS7VCdHu78Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
