------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-24 01:03 ------- Created an attachment (id=51) --> (http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51&action=view) Adds an expansion operator rfc2047d Should be as simple as this, shouldn't it? Named analogously to base62/base62d. Compiled and briefly tested. What about the error handling? rfc2047_decode() only indicates an error in one situation: if iconv_open() fails. Should expansion fail if that happens? Other errors cause the (rest of the) encoded string to be returned untouched. If iconv_open() fails we could then as well let the QP- or B64-decoded text be returned untranslated. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##