------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=457 ------- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-31 11:59 ------- On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The semantics described in sections 10.9 > > through 10.17 should work, at least when the item being checked is an IP > > address. > > So use match_ip! But match_ip only accepts IP addresses/networks in the list, and I can't understand why the same matching as with the hosts ACL condition can't be used here, but with an arbitrary address to check. > > What have I missed? Even if it's not entirely clear how to specify > > cleanly how this test should work, it should be possible to decide on a > > sufficiently meaningful specification. > > That's the point. I felt that it was indeed not clear how to specify this > cleanly. Can you elaborate? Do you have any examples of particularly dirty situations? Should a domain name that resolves to multiple IP addresses have to have *all* those IP addresses match the host list? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.exim.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
