On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > Perhaps the best (or simplest) solution is, after all, to add body_linecount > and body_zerocount to the API, and make it the responsibility of the > local_scan() function to update them?
I suppose so, though I do not really want to encourage people to write to the fd. However, given that they can see these variables anyway, via the "back door" I suppose it isn't giving away much to put them into the official API, though it's a bit of work to update the code and the documentation. > Isn't it true that all line endings are converted to '\n' on > reception? Yes, that's true. > Whatever the decision, I'd very much appreciate one in the next few days, > otherwise I'll have to ask Marc Haber to back out the "reduce the dynamic > symbol table" patch from the "dynamic local_scan" patch. Well, there won't be another Exim release for some time, given that 4.67 came out last week. But I guess you can patch it. :-) -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
