Apologies if I'm being foolish (no caffeine yet), but this patch looks wrong to my untrained eye ...
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > nm4 2008/01/30 20:09:24 GMT > > Modified files: > exim-doc/doc-txt ChangeLog > exim-src/src exicyclog.src > Log: > exicyclog additions. Fixes: #602 [...] > Index: exicyclog.src > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/exicyclog.src,v > retrieving revision 1.5 > retrieving revision 1.6 > diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 > --- exicyclog.src 16 Mar 2006 11:51:10 -0000 1.5 > +++ exicyclog.src 30 Jan 2008 20:09:24 -0000 1.6 [...] > @@ -235,6 +241,9 @@ > if [ -f $rejectlog.$keept ]; then $rm $rejectlog.$keept; fi; > if [ -f $rejectlog.$keept.$suffix ]; then $rm $rejectlog.$keept.$suffix; > fi; > > +if [ -f $paniclog.$keept ]; then $rm $rejectlog.$keept; fi; > +if [ -f $paniclog.$keept.$suffix ]; then $rm $rejectlog.$keept.$suffix; fi; > + > # Now rename all the previous old files by increasing their numbers by 1. > # When the number is less than 10, insert a leading zero. > [...] Surely that's removing the wrong files? Regards, Richard -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
