Folks,
I've committed changes which allow Routers to have multiple condition
options. As part of making this as simple as possible, I've added a new
expansion condition, bool_lax{}. It's much like bool{}, but input which
would cause bool{} to fail expansion cause bool_lax{} to return true.
Also, bool_lax{00} is false, because that's what happens on condition
lines too. A ... very curious state of affairs.
I'm not in love with the name "bool_lax" -- it was a
least-amount-of-thought name. We can change it any time up until the
4.73 RC packaging starts. If anyone has any better suggestions, please
follow-up in this thread.
Thanks,
-Phil
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
