On 26 Feb 2011, at 21:08, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2011-02-26 at 18:38 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> About copyright. Both exim itself and the documentation source
>> (*.xfpt) is labeled as "copyright 2011 University of Cambridge". What
>> about the contribution of the current developer team, did you assign
>> copyright to the University of Cambridge?
No assignment from those of us not working at Cambridge.
I updated the year when updating bits a little while back, and wondered
about changing the wording (maybe adding and Maintainer) but decided to
leave that battle for another day.
> I've wondered about the cam.ac.uk ownership claim but decided it wasn't
> important enough to me to make an issue out of it, since it's all
> released as GPL anyway and I have no interest in helping someone else
> re-licence the work.
It can all be taken as GPL
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham ------------------------------ [email protected] ]
[ Ellipsis Intangible Technologies ]
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
