On 2012-05-20 00:19, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-05-19 at 23:43 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
On 2012-05-19 23:34, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-05-19 at 23:28 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
-
s/X=TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256/X=TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256/g;
+
s/TLS1.[012]:(DHE_)?RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA(1|256):256/TLS1.x:xxxxRSA_AES_256_CBC_SHAnnn:256/g;
[...]
Is it necessary to drop the X= ? There were other instances where this
was needed?
Yes, the same canonicalisation is needed for a (Received ?) header.
*sigh* Well, the text suite is not part of the release, merely run for
the release, so feel free to make whatever changes you think best here.
As long as it still runs on my GnuTLS 2.12.x and 2.10.x test boxes I'll
be happy.
Pushed that; would you like to give it a whirl?
--
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
