On 2012-06-02 08:16, Phil Pennock wrote:
                                      On the other hand the secondary feature
    (use of TLS by verify-callouts)  *will* activate automatically.

Please not unless specifically requested: TLS is quite heavy and that
adds to the verify burden.  Can you make this something that has to be
enabled, either by "verify_tls" on the transports, or a flag on the
ACL control modifier?

OK, I'll add a switch, defaulting "off".

Because of the interaction between "pure" verify callouts and
cutthrough deliveries neither the new control= nor the
verify= really feels like the right place.   I'll put it on the transport
for now; can always move it later.


Did this help at all?  Would it help if I did something similar for
OpenSSL?  We're 1/4 of the way there already, with the "callback" data
structure used for SNI.

Keeping up with you has been a major effort :)

There may be some tidying needed after I merge.


I favour $tls_in_* and $tls_out_* and keep the existing names, resetting
as appropriate.  Mark the existing names deprecated and state that we're
likely to remove them in, say, Exim 5.

OK.

--
Jeremy

--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim 
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##

Reply via email to