On 2012-06-02 08:19, Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-06-01 at 22:01 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote:
I'm guessing from the message, due to 1f4a55daf :
Yes. For now, just accept the update. We're going to have to figure
out flag-controllable munging, so that we can munge this away *unless*
the test is about DNSSEC in particular.
I kinda think we need per-testcase-custom munge filters, in addition
to (and possibly subsuming parts of) the wedge of string-translations
done by munge() in runtest. A layer of indirection would provide for
common cases - the present case would have all of
0002, 0094, 0381, 2202
all pointing to a single script doing
'grep -v "Reverse DNS security status"' on stderr.
Would this do?
--
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
