On 2012-06-12 09:50, Janne Snabb wrote:
On 2012-06-12 04:32, Jeremy Harris wrote:
In a fit of coding insanity I ran up the following:
[...]
Is there any value in this going forward?
[...]
This makes me think: perhaps the facility could also allow multiple
arguments, as in ${acl {name}{argument1}{argument2}{argument3}}.
The subroutine/sub-acl could receive these arguments in $arg1, $arg2,...
variables and also supply $argn which gives the number of supplied
arguments?
It could be done. Question: would you also want the existing modifier
extended to support
acl = acl_name arg1 arg2 ...
?
--
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
