On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Todd Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: >>> What do you think about setting +smtp_confirmation as a default value? >> Realistically, +smtp_confirmation is the one there which is most useful >> for diagnostics for helping others, so I can see that we could turn that >> on without starting down a slippery slope. > Turning this on by default is a one line change in macros.h. That
Committed this a while back, with a long list of test logs, stdout, and stderr that changed. There were a few things that I'm not configured to run, if anybody comes across a diff that just adds a: C="some status" ...please do commit it for me. > BTW, does anybody have the database contents that are expected for the > mysql checks? A quick schema with the data would be nice. If nobody > but Philip has it anywhere, we should be able to deduce what it wants > (not all that _fun_ though :-) Nobody's got it, eh? ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
