On 2012-08-07 at 06:31 -0700, Todd Lyons wrote: > So I saw on a Freecode daily email that a new release of rspamd was > available. It claims to have 10x better performance than spamassassin > with the same rules. Has anybody ever used it?
No. > This patch is in their source to get it working with exim: > https://bitbucket.org/vstakhov/rspamd/src/649c61b89b43/contrib/exim/patch-exim-src_spam.c.diff It appears to be under a BSD-ish with-advertising license. Although the changes are simple, it would be polite to drop a note to the author, asking if it's okay to pull his changes into the GPL'd Exim (and then we add to the ACKNOWLEDGMENTS file). > It looks like good code to me, so with a little bit of #ifdef we could > make rspam vs spamassassin a compile time setting. Or maybe add a new > "rspam" condition that calls this code instead of the existing "spam" > condition code. Compile-time would be a last resort, IMO. rspam is nice, slightly nicer is a protocol variant option. Either spamd_options in the main config section, to go with spamd_address, or a /modifier for the spam ACL condition, much like the /modifiers on malware checks, etc. "variant=rspam"? Or just "rspam"? I leave the decision on syntax to those doing the work. -Phil -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
