On 2012-11-25 at 14:11 +0000, Jeremy Harris wrote: > On 11/25/2012 06:24 AM, Phil Pennock wrote: > > I've been careful to not change the title date (first change above), > > only the revision history date, for a related reason: if no change was > > made, I don't want to change the title publication date. We're just > > "reprinting" it, not "republishing". > > Is it worth introducing a "printed at" date, distinct from the > "content last modified" date? Like "2nd impression 2012" > in a printed book?
"Included with" or "Current as of"? It might be clearer and help when folks are trying to figure out if the documentation still applies, or has stopped being maintained, etc. So, sounds good to me. :) -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
