On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Todd Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 01/24/2013 09:31 PM, Jeremy Harris wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to merge a squashed >>> version [of PRDR] back into the Exim mainline. >> Now done. > > It's now built and running on m.lm.ivenue.com. It's jgh's prdr > branch, which is not very far behind current master. > > [todd@tlyons ~/projects/exim_jgh (prdr)]$ git remote -v > origin git://git.exim.org/users/jgh/exim.git (fetch) > origin git://git.exim.org/users/jgh/exim.git (push) > > I still have to create some test users and rules to apply to them, but > it's a live server and capable of testing (once I get the users > created). There is at least one live (to the public internet) domain > that I will be able to create these test users on.
Users are created and available for testing: [email protected] [email protected] (will always be deferred) [email protected] (do I have to describe it?) I do have a question about behavior. Witness the following SMTP conversation: [todd@tlyons ~]$ telnet m.lm.ivenue.com 25 Trying 208.89.138.62... Connected to m.lm.ivenue.com. Escape character is '^]'. 220-m.lm.ivenue.com, ESMTP Exim 4.81_RC1+libopendmarc, Wed, 06 Feb 2013 220 18:31:38 +0000 EHLO tlyons.ivenue.net 250-m.lm.ivenue.com Hello tlyons.ivenue.net [192.168.1.16] 250-SIZE 52428800 250-8BITMIME 250-ETRN 250-EXPN 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN 250-STARTTLS 250-PRDR 250 HELP MAIL FROM:<[email protected]> PRDR 250 OK, PRDR Requested RCPT TO:<[email protected]> 250 Accepted RCPT TO:<[email protected]> 250 Accepted RCPT TO:<[email protected]> 250 Accepted DATA 354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself <snip valid message> . 353 PRDR content analysis beginning 550 PRDR R=<[email protected]> refusal 450 PRDR R=<[email protected]> temporary refusal 250 PRDR R=<[email protected]> acceptance 550 Detected dedicated spamware generated email quit 221 m.lm.ivenue.com closing connection It seems like the 250 PRDR response should not get issued until after the message passes the actual DATA acl, no? You can't issue a 250 and then turn around and reject it AFAIK. ...5 minutes later... WRONG. According to the draft: 4.5.3. The Final Response Code After the server has transmitted all of the recipient-specific response lines, a final response that indicates whether or not the server will accept responsibility for the email message as a whole MUST be returned.j So in this case, it is doing exactly as it is spec'd. My initial trial shows that it works, for this narrow test case. Anybody else from the outside want to test PRDR against my test server, go for it. Give me some return mailboxes that I can use to test the client implementation as well. ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
