Hello,
we got problems with the header syntax check: failed: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22H=E4le,_Anita=22?= <[email protected]> passed: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22H=E4le=2C_Anita=22?= <[email protected]> The difference is the "comma" inside the quoted printable part of the address. Is there some document describing the correct parsing of such header lines? In RFC5322 (internet message format) and RFC 2045 (MIME extensions) I do not find anything that could point me to some answer. Is it Exims fault? Should/could Exim be more liberal? Or is it the fault of the MUA generating the failing line? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Grüße aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: 7CBF764A - gnupg fingerprint: 9288 F17D BBF9 9625 5ABC 285C 26A9 687E 7CBF 764A - (gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B)-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
