On 07/09/2013 03:03 PM, Todd Lyons wrote:
2. My thoughts were a little less extravagant. I was a member of the
Samba build farm for a few years. Participants' machines synced to
the master samba buildfarm server (multiple repos), built multiple
configs when new commits were found, ran samba torture (essentially
make test), and results were submitted back up to a master samba
buildfarm server, where it was parsed and made available for
display/analysis. I'd like to consider doing the same for Exim.
There are a couple of public projects that use a distributed build
farm, and we could simply model off of their systems.
The two ideas aren't mutually exclusive, but they do have common
portions which make it somewhat duplicative to do both. Comments,
feedback?
The Samba build farm sounds somewhat like the Postgresql one:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Buildfarm_Howto
--
Jeremy
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim
details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
