On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2013-09-26 Todd Lyons <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have uploaded Exim 4.82 RC1 to > It builds ok and seems to work for me (see headers ;-), it does not > advertise itself as 4.82, though: > ametzler@argenau:$ /usr/sbin/exim4 -be '$version_number' > 4.80_230-b1f3784
My fault. I just tagged it instead of doing a signed tag. The reversion script extracts that version information from the latest tag and specifically ignores non-annotated tags. > Also the txt docs are empty: > ametzler@argenau:/tmp/EXIM4/exim-4.82$ ls -l doc/filter.txt doc/spec.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 ametzler ametzler 0 Sep 26 14:41 doc/filter.txt > -rw-r--r-- 1 ametzler ametzler 0 Sep 26 14:41 doc/spec.txt I'll fix it before I do the next release. ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
