On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:53 AM, Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> wrote: >> I haven't heard of any further build issues with RC5. If I don't hear >> anything show-stopper by the end of the weekend, especially with >> respect to the GnuTLS issues, I'll release on Monday morning. > I have uploaded rc5 to Debian/experimental. it failed to build on > GNU/hurd > <https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=exim4&suite=experimental> > but I do not think that should stop a release.
Thanks Andreas. Exercising the GnuTLS build was exactly what I was hoping for. Regarding the hurd build error, is there some #ifdef guard we can put in place to properly protect against it for hurd like systems? I assume this is just an old ipv6 stack that doesn't have some newer feature. Something along the lines of this completely wild guess: #ifdef IPV6_TCLASS *optname = IPV6_TCLASS; #else *optname = NULL; #endif Is there an easy way to see what /usr/include/bits/in.h or /usr/include/linux/in6.h contains for hurd? ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
