On 2014-03-02 at 14:27 +0000, Jeremy Harris wrote: > One's in the documentation, the other on the source. Which shall we > settle on?
Crap; I renamed before the first release with the new functionality, on the basis that it was safe, sorry for creating this mess. The reasons for the rename still stand: ----------------------------8< cut here >8------------------------------ commit 0fbd9bff71b47e3a32e54629c3f67e7eda1812fe Author: Phil Pennock <[email protected]> Date: Sat Mar 23 19:46:22 2013 -0400 Rename dns_use_dnssec to dns_dnssec_ok. This per Tony's suggestion; this makes it clearer that we are merely setting resolver flags, not performing validation ourselves. Well, clearer to those who understand DNSSEC. For everyone else, they'll still be dependent upon a forthcoming new chapter to the Specification. ----------------------------8< cut here >8------------------------------ I can go ahead and rename in docs, if people are happy with that, or someone else can if you don't want to wait on me. -Phil -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
