On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Marcin Gryszkalis <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2014-04-22 01:57, Phil Pennock wrote: >> My general philosophy has been "we'll take contributions via any sane >> means; we don't have so many contributors that we want to make people >> jump through hoops, but we do _prefer_ to have things in our Bugzilla >> for tracking. For non-contentious changes, working from a GitHub PR is >> fine." (and I think I'm previously on record as saying that). > I like that philosophy, but I'm not sure if I understand you well - is > it better to do pull request from my fork (like I did yesterday) or to > create .patch file and upload to exim's bugzilla?
I believe he is recommending: "please also create a bug on the exim bug tracker that briefly describes what the patch does and add a link to your pull request." You did not do anything wrong! We are very appreciative of the patch! It's just that a few years in the future, tracking when features/changes/fixes were made to exim are easier if they are in the bug tracking system. It can be simply links/urls to the locations of the fixes, but they are all in one central location. ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
