------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1521 Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> 2014-08-29 12:43:38 --- 1) Is it more correct (in LDAP terms) to treat the x-MailPrimaryAddress and x-MailAlternateAddress as being a single attribute, given that the lookup was for "mail"? Or as multiple attributes, given that the return from the library has multiple attribute structures? 2) Is it more useful for Exim ldap lookups to work one way, or the other - the "other" being a return for this example of [email protected] [email protected],[email protected] [ attached alternate patch. A bit long but mainly due to indentation changes ] Are both behaviours useful in different cases (should we provide an option switch)? 3) How does the initial proposed patch work for the case of a lookup requesting two attributes, one of which derives a pair of SUP'd ones? Is it dependent on the ordering of attribute structures presented by the ldap library? Do all the libraries we support provide ordering guarantees for the situation? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
