On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote: > On 03/09/14 01:27, Phil Pennock wrote: >> My jaw dropped when I returned to my list index view and saw just how >> many patches came in from work this weekend by Todd and Jeremy to >> implement DANE in Exim.
Jeremy gets to take the bow for this one. My contributions are the initial build plumbing and incorporating Viktor's OpenSSL based DANE framework so that it built. Jeremy did all the hard work of doing DNS lookups, certificate handling, actually calling into the DANE framework, analyzing results, etc. How do we do licensing, since that entire file (dane-openssl.c) is Viktor's original code? Viktor, how is that code licensed? > I did wonder if I should have squashed to a single commit to avoid > the mess in the timeline. Do we have a preference, in git usage on > the Exim master? Back when I committed the DMARC patches, Phil had me target a rebase for 2-5 distinct patches. I think that's probably what we should use as a goal in the future. I do like your numerous individual patches too though since I can see and better understand incremental steps in the thought process. ...Todd -- The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0. If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want, send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
